Home / Latest News / NLUD’s Centre on Death Penalty releases its Report titled “Matters of Judgment”. Read the Report here

NLUD’s Centre on Death Penalty releases its Report titled “Matters of Judgment”. Read the Report here

December 10,2017:

Significant number of judges, ‘rarest of rare’ was based on description of the offences alone and had little to do with judicial test requiring that alternative of the life imprisonment be ‘unquestionably foreclosed.’

Death by Hanging
Death Penalty

On Saturday, National Law University of Delhi’s Centre on Death Penalty released a comprehensive report on the capital punishment in India, which is titled as ‘Matters of Judgment‘.

The report is  an opinion study on criminal justice system and death penalty. It features interviews with 60 Former Supreme Court Judges like Justices AK Ganguly, Justice Santosh Hegde, Justice Ruma Pal, Justice BN Srikrishna and Justice RC Lahoti who adjudicated on 208 Death Penalty cases among them between 1975 and 2016.

Report further provides for acknowledgment and widespread concern among the Former SC judges about crisis in India’s criminal justice system on the account of the widespread prevalence of the torture, fabrication of the evidence, abysmal quality of the legal aid and the wrongful convictions.

Despite 43 Former Apex Court Judges acknowledging the wrongful convictions as a worrying reality, only the five judges recognised the ‘possibility of error’ as a possible reason for the abolition of death penalty in India.

Report points out that there exists no uniform understanding of requirements of ‘rarest of rare’ doctrine in the furtherance of Bachan Singh Judgment (1980) and thus giving rise to the serious concerns about judge-centric sentencing.

23 former judges supported that Deterrence emerged as the strongest penological justification for retaining death penalty.

Read the Report @ Latest Laws : Click Here


Facebook Comments

Check Also

Mobile pics & videos may be allowed as Primary Evidence under Evidence Act, 1872

January 20, 2018 “Required amendments may be incorporated in Cr.P.C. or in Evidence Act,” the proposal says. The Centre is planning to amend the Evidence Act, 1872; in order to incorporate images & videos captured from mobile phone as ‘primary ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *