Home / Latest News / Scores of clandestine appointments made by Chief Justice of High Court trashed

Scores of clandestine appointments made by Chief Justice of High Court trashed

​​September,27,2015: Gujarat High Court has reportedly fired 89 employees, recruited “without using public advertisement” and without following any selection procedure. These employees, belonging to class-III and class-IV grade posts such as peons and clerks, were recruited by former Acting Chief Justice V.M. Sahai, using the power bestowed under Article 229 of the Constitution of India.

Registrar General B.N. Karia informed that the decision was taken by a Committee of five Judges.

Show-cause notices were earlier issued to a total of 94 employees, asking them to respond within 11 days. These were accepted by the Court. 5 employees were exempted as had been employed on compensatory grounds.

The notice had relied on a Supreme Court judgment and said, “even under the constitution, the power of appointment granted to the Chief Justice under Article 229 (1) is subject to Article 16 (1) which guarantees equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment…”

The notice further stated, “the law can be summarized to the effect that powers under Article 229 (2) of the constitution can’t be exercised by the Chief Justice in an unfettered and arbitrary manner. Appointments should be made giving adherence to the provisions of Article 14 and 16 of the constitution and/or such rules as made by the legislative.”

The irregularity in appointments was pointed out by Advocate General Kamal Trivedi in open Court. Justice Sahai had then remarked that he did not want to open up a “Pandora’s box”, referring to the several scams that have plagued the judiciary.

Acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court Justice V M Sahai, who retired recently was given a “cold” farewell. Many of his colleagues and the Bar did not attend the high tea hosted by him at his residence. Justice Sahai had stirred a controversy when he had taken up a suo motu PIL, seeking replies from 27 Judges (both sitting and retired) of the Court, the state Revenue Department; and the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation among other government agencies, regarding the 2008 allotment of residential plots to sitting and retired judges. This case was then referred to a larger bench, after framing 10 questions.

Supreme Court had then stayed this order, allowing deletion of the names of the Judges. It had further expressed its disapproval with the Gujarat High Court order and observed, “The high court was in mortal hurry. This should not have happened.” 

Refusing to talk about it, Justice Sahai said he had enjoyed his five-year term in the High Court. He said the atmosphere in the Gujarat High Court was much better than the Allahabad High Court, from where he had been transferred. “I liked Gujarat. I was a safer place for old people compared to Uttar Pradesh and Delhi,” he said. “A number of young lawyers had planned a farewell for Justice Sahai, which was cancelled following the PIL. We had sympathy for him and supported his move,” said a senior member of the Gujarat High Court Advocate Association. 


​Related News-

13.8.2015 – Supreme Court annoyed at ‘Mortal Hurry’ of Retiring Gujarat High Court Chief Justice in issuing Notice to sitting SC and HC Judges in Plot allotment case READ MORE…

Facebook Comments

Check Also

Attorney General K.K Venugopal

SC seeks assistance of AG Venugopal on plea seeking ban on MLAs & MPs practising as Advocates

February 17,2018: On Friday, Supreme Court sought assistance of the Attorney General K.K. Venugopal on a plea seeking a ban on members of Parliament and legislative assemblies practising as advocates. Petition has been filed by Advocate and BJP Spokesperson Ashwini ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *