Monday, 20, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University

Category SideBar

Fatal Accidents Act, 1855


The Fatal Accidents Act, 1855

(13 of 1855)

129

An Act to provide compensation to families for loss occasioned by the death of a person caused by actionable wrong.

Preamble .Whereas no action or suit is now maintainable in any Court against a person who, by his wrongful act, neglect or default, may have caused the death of another person, and it is often-times right and expedient that the wrong-doer in such case should be answerable in damages for the injury so caused by him; It is enacted as follows:

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 6

 

·  Indian Limitation Act, 1871 (9 of 1871)

 

 

·  Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914)

·  Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 (3 of 1951)

 

FACT SHEET 6

 

·  Short title [The Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855].

 

 

·  This Act is based on the Fatal Accidents Act, 1846 (9 & 10 Vict., Clause 93).

·  This Act has been declared to be in force in the whole of British India, except as regards the Scheduled Districts by the Laws Local Extent Act, 1874, Section 3.

·  It has been extended to the new Provinces and merged States by the Merged States (Laws) Act 59 of 1949 and to

·  the States of Manipur, Tripura and Vindhya Pradesh by the Union Territories (Laws) Act 30 of 1950. Manipur and Tripura are full-fledged States now, see Act 81 of 1971. Vindhya Pradesh is a part of the State of Madhya Pradesh now, see Act 37 of 1956.

·  The Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 has been extended to the Union territory of Pondicherry by Act 26 of 1968 (w.e.f. 1.8.1968).

·  The Act has been extended to and enforced in Sikkim w.e.f. 31.12.1984, see S.O.529(E) of 1983 and S.O.982(E) of 1984.

[1. Short title and extent .(1) This Act may be called The Fatal Accidents Act, 1855.

(2) I t extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.]

[1-A]. Suit for compensation to the family of a person for loss occasioned to it by his death by actionable wrong .Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, the party who would have been liable if death had not ensued, shall be liable to an action or suit for damages, notwithstanding the death of the person injured, and although the death shall have been caused under such circumstances as amount in law to felony or other crime.

[---] Every such action or suit shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent and child, if any, of the person whose death shall have been so caused, and shall be brought by and in the name of the executor, administrator, or representative of the person deceased;

and in every such action the Court may give such damages as it may think proportioned to the loss resulting from such death to the parties respectively, for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought; and the amount so recovered, after deducting all costs and expenses, including the costs not recovered from the defendant, shall be divided amongst the before-mentioned parties, or any of them, in such shares as the Court by its judgment or decree shall direct.

  1. Not more than one suit to be brought .Provided always that not more than one action or suit shall be brought for, and in respect of the same subject-matter of complaint [- - -]:

Claim for loss to estate may be added .Provided that, in any such action or suit, the executor, administrator, or representative of the deceased may insert a claim for, and recover any pecuniary loss to the estate of the deceased occasioned by such wrongful act, neglect or default, which sum, when recovered, shall be deemed part of the assets of the estate of the deceased.

  1. Plaintiff shall deliver particulars, etc .The plaint in any such action or suit shall give a full particular of the person or persons for whom, or on whose behalf, such action or suit shall be brought, and of the nature of the claim in respect of which damages shall be sought to be recovered.
  2. Interpretation-clause .The following words and expressions are intended to have the meanings hereby assigned to them respectively, so far as such meanings are not excluded by the context or by the nature of the subject-matter, that is to say [- - -]the word person shall apply to bodies politic and corporate; and the word parent shall include father and [mother]and grand-father and grand-mother; and the word child shall include son and daughter and grand-son and grand-daughter and step-son and step-daughter.
 

 
Related News & Articles :
Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Related judgement on Fatal Accidents Act, 1855

N. Jayasree Vs. Cholamandalam Ms. General Insurance Company Ltd., 2021 Latest Caselaw 513 SC Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra Vs. The State of Jharkhand [MARCH 23, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 203 SC Damini and another Vs. Managing Director, Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and Another [SEPTEMBER 14, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 678 SC Kumaran Vs. State of Kerala & ANR. [May 5, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 415 SC National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rekhaben & Ors. [MARCH 07, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 205 SC Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shashi Sharma & Ors. [23rd September, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 690 SC Montford Brothers of St. Gabriel & ANR. Vs. United India Insurance & ANR. Etc. [January 28, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 55 SC Puttamma & Ors. Vs. K. L. Narayana Reddy & ANR. [DECEMBER 9, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 858 SC K.A.Abbas H.S.A. Vs. Sabu Joseph & ANR. [2010] INSC 389 (11 May 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 382 SC Manish Jalan Vs. State of Karnataka [2008] INSC 1095 (11 July 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 598 SC Jacob Mathew Vs. State of Punjab & ANR [2005] INSC 390 (5 August 2005), 2005 Latest Caselaw 390 SC The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hansrajbhai Vs. Kodala & Ors [2001] INSC 192 (4 April 2001), 2001 Latest Caselaw 192 SC Shivaji Dayanu Patil & ANR Vs. Smt. Vatschala Uttam More [1991] INSC 158 (17 July 1991), 1991 Latest Caselaw 158 SC Charan Lal Sahu Vs. Union of India & Ors [1989] INSC 395 (22 December 1989), 1989 Latest Caselaw 395 SC Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Ahmedabad. Vs. Ramanbhai Prabhatbhai & ANR [1987] INSC 163 (11 May 1987), 1987 Latest Caselaw 162 SC Palaniappa Gounder Vs. State Tamil Nadu & Ors [1977] INSC 77 (4 March 1977), 1977 Latest Caselaw 77 SC New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Shanti Misra [1975] INSC 262 (10 October 1975), 1975 Latest Caselaw 260 SC Shyam Sunder And Othes Vs. The State of Rajasthan [1974] INSC 53 (12 March 1974), 1974 Latest Caselaw 53 SC C. K. Subramonia Iyer & Ors Vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair and 6 Ors [1969] INSC 273 (8 October 1969), 1969 Latest Caselaw 273 SC Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Subhagwanti & Ors [1966] INSC 54 (24 February 1966), 1966 Latest Caselaw 54 SC